Movie review of "midnight's chidren"

The movie “midnight’s Children is based on the Famous novel by Salman Rushdie. The film is directed by Deepa Mehta and Screen play by Salman Rushdie. In this movie we can find historical facts, magic realism and religion conflict.

                The title of this movie is appropriate according to the story of this movie. Title is that "midnights children", it is connected with the historical event like partition of India and Pakistan and Emergency of 1975 in India. When we get freedom from white people at that time there were crises between two religions Hindu and Muslim. They were fighting with each other. As same here also we can see that type of crises between Shiva and Saleem, Shiva is Hindu and Saleem is Muslim both were born at the stroke of midnight of 14^th August 1947 In the movie  letter on they know that Saleem is Hindu and Shiva is Muslim. These two children have super power of communication through their thought. So from this type of movie we must have to learn that religion made by us and if it is harmful for us then we must have to remove it.
        
             Because after all we all are human beings and our blood is same but we make this type of various religions. But if people are fighting with each other because of those religions so what are the use of those religions. So I want to say that this movie is very interesting. And technique of telling story is outstanding. At the end of movie Saleem said that Marry is mother (who is Christian), Adam is my son (son of Shiva and Parvati) and he is Muslim.

Movie review: the great dictator

Adolf hitler was, of course, guilty of many crimes, but it's tempting to think that what annoyed Charlie Chaplin the most was his appropriation of his trademark 'tache.  This was Chaplin's first true talkie (and his biggest hit), and it's also an incredibly brave and progressive film that seems specifically designed to irritate Hitler personally.

Chaplin plays both a Jewish barber and a comically paranoid and ruthless dictator called Adenoid Hynkel; riffing on Mark Twain's The Prince and the Pauper, each man is mistaken for the other. It's not just Hitler who gets mocked; Goebbels becomes Garbitsch, Mussolini becomes the buffoonish Napolini … it was, unsurprisingly, not released in Germany.

Made as the war got under way, Chaplin later said that had he known of the full extent of the Nazi horrors, he wouldn't have deemed them a laughing matter. But we can be thankful that he did: not only did this hammer Hitler's reputation, but it was also one of the first Hollywood films to tackle antisemitism. 

In a climate of US isolationism, Chaplin' savagely funny film painted Hitler as someone to be mocked. It's a film that, particularly in its legendary closing speech, bares its teeth not only to smile but to bite.