Sunday, 19 November 2017

Worthsworth

 

Classicism and Romanticism are two ideologies and kind of school of thoughts and something more than that. It gives us some ideas about dominance of certain things, in both era they were differents. Neo classisnm it was a period where intellect was considered most. Pope, Dryden they were neo-classicist who believed in intellectual works. But in the Romanticism, the major poets like Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, Keats's poetry we find more imaginative concept than intellect. Their poetry were based on their imagination. In Neo-classicist believed there should ne restraint, but romantic poets didn't believe in any kind of restraint, in fact they believed in liberty, and poets had right to write what they want to. Neo-classicists followed the masters like Aristotle, Plato, Socrates. But Romantic poets were more inspired by Medieval time's poets. In Neo-classicism urban life was represented and in Romanticism the poets were more attracted to countryside, rustic life. Classic poets believed poetry as an objective whereas romantic poets believed poetry is subjective.

According to Wordsworth the way of writing of neo-classicists was highly unnecessary ornamental. He is interested in writing the poems and lyrical ballad in the language that really used by men. He finds humble rustic life, and to be with the genuine emotions, he wants to capture yhe emotions of countryside men by his rustic words and diction he finds it very close.

Wordsworth asks what is the poet not who is poet. A poet is a man who is speaking to men. But poet is a person who differs from other people in degree, he has more tenderness, enthusiasm and a better knowledge about Human nature. Wordsworth uses a word for poet that he has a comprehensive soul. His participation in spirits of life is much more than an ordinary person.

Wordsworth' definition of "poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings.” Poetry has its origin in the internal feelings of the poet. It is a matter of passion & mood. Poetry cannot be produced ideology set by the Classicists. It must flow out naturally and smoothly from the soul of the poet. But it must be noted that good poetry, according to Wordsworth, is never an immediate expression of such powerful emotions. A good poet must ponder over them long and deeply.

Wordsworth's famous poem Daffodils, we find this poem has 4 stanzas, the first three stanzas are in past tense, he begins his poem in past tense while poem's last - the fourth stanza is in present tense. The inspiration for the poem came from a walk Wordsworth took with his sister Dorothy in the Lake District. He has drawn on this to compose "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud". This poem beautiful, a poem that can make you happy!

Tuesday, 14 November 2017

Dryden as dramatic poesy



Image result for Dryden
 
.1]Do you find any difference between Aristotle's definition of Tragedy and Dryden's definition of Play?

 There is a difference between Aristotle’s definition of tragedy and Dryden’s definition of play. According to Aristotle tragedy is an imitation of an action which is serious, complete and of certain magnitude; he emphasises on serious action which can arouse pity and fear in the audience. While Dryden says that a play should be just and lively image of human nature. For Aristotle tragedy is imitation of serious action and for Dryden imitation is not only “just” but “lively” also. For Aristotle the function of “catharsis” is important in tragedy, but the reading of the play hardly give catharsis. As per Dryden play is just for the delight and instruction of the audience. Play is the representation of life as it is as per Dryden and on the other hand, Aristotle did not support representation of realistic situation of life.

2]If you are supposed to give your personal predilection, would you be on the side of the Ancient or the Modern? Please give reasons.

According to my personal opinion, I am on the side of the ancients as far as literature and music are concerned. The language is the gift from the ancients through which the writing has progressed. Ancients imitated their history in their work from where we get idea of the history, and through reading them we come to know about past. It is necessary to know your past to brighten your present. The knowledge of words we use for writing is the gift of ancients. For e.g.:- Dr.Johnson’s “The dictionary of the English Language”. The root is the part which holds the tree, same way ancients are the root which helps the moderns to grow. If consider science and technology than we can see that moderns are better. In ancient times many people died due to cancer and other deadly disease. The moderns have made tremendous progress in this field which the ancients were not able to do.
We can say that modern excels in science and technology, ancients excels in art whether it is literature, music or painting. “Moderns are the dwarfs standing on the shoulder of the giants; the shoulder of the ancients”.


3) Do you think that the arguments presented in favour of the French plays and against English plays are appropriate? (Say for example, Death should not be performed as it is neither 'just' not 'lively' image, displaying duel fight with blunted swords, thousands of soldiers marching represented as five on stage, mingling of mirth and serious, multiple plots etc.)

The arguments presented in the favour of the French plays by Lisideius against English plays are appropriate at some extent. For example the death scene, it is not possible to show it. No one can express the feeling of death without going through. As per sub-plots are concerned I would like to support English plays. Audience enjoys the mixture of sub-plots with the main plot. It makes play interesting, if presented well.

4) What would be your preference so far as poetic or prosaic dialogues are concerned in the play? 

 As per my opinion, prosaic dialogues are more preferable in the play. According to Dryden, play is the representation of life as it is. Imagine if our teachers or parents or friends talks with us in poetic way. Prosaic dialogues connect the audience with the play. Poetic lines limit the thoughts of the writer as he has to complete the lines as per rhyme scheme. In day to day no one uses poetic lines. All the audience cannot understand the spirit of poetry. Gandhiji said that literature should be written in a simple way that even a farmer could read. As far as play is concerned I agree with this thing that prosaic lines bring simplicity which can be understood by all the type of audience.

kenneth branagh's Hamlet based on shakespear's 'Hamlet'

'HAMLET'  MOVIE by Kenneth Branagh is based on original play 'HAMLET' by William Shakespeare .

Image result for Hamlet Kenneth Branagh
  • How faithful is the movie to the original play? after watching the movie, have your perception about play, characters or situations changed?  
Yes , the movie is as faithful as the original  play, because the play starts with the statue of “King Hamlet”- the father of Hamlet and end with the fall of the statue of King Hamlet. In the play, the statue shows us the “Rising and Falling action” of the Throne.

Yes , after watching the movie my perception about the character of “Ophelia”. In the movie, the director doesn’t give more important the character of Ophelia, but whatever I watched about the character of Ophelia, it was very effective and tragic way throughout the movie.

  • Do you feel aesthetic delight while watching the movie?

I feel aesthetic delight while watching the movie when Ophelia was gone mad not for her father’s death but for the love of Hamlet, and therefore in that scene I can see the “Tragic Beauty” of the Ophelia which feel me aesthetic delight’
  • Do you feel catharsis while or after watching the film?
.
Yes, I feel catharsis while watching the movie when Hamlet’s fable minded behavior with Ophelia very badly for asking her father . And the another catharsis that I felt was that when Ophelia was gone mad and sing a mad song with full of tragic emotions.
  • Does screening of the movie helped you in better understanding?

Yes, the screening of movie help me in better understanding of the play, like it help me to remember the important scenes – ghost scene, and also remember me some minor characters like Rosencrantze and Guildenstern . But somewhere I can’t get the important dialogs from the movie.

Image result for Kenneth Branagh Hamlet Ophelia
  • Was there any particular scene that you will cherish lifetime

Yes, I cherish the particular scene or moment in the play.
1) Ghost scene- by technically it was very effective , eye-catchy  and feels me somewhere horrible.
2) When Hamlet acted as he was mad, that scene spread little humour in the movie.
3) And the another one is Ophelia’s character give me a long lasting effect through the whole movie that I never forgot.


Image result for Kenneth Branagh Hamlet Ophelia

  • If you are a director what changes would you like to make?
If I am director of this movie, I would like to make ghost scene more horrible and another one is that I would like to change the character of Ophelia and Hamlet’s age because Ophelia was very younger than the Hamlet.

  • What does the fallen statue signifies?
As my understanding , I find the symbolism in the play is “Revenge”. Because revenge itself is not a good idea and revenge never end, never sleep. And therefore Hamlet is responsible for himself to take revenge.



  • While studying the play through movie, which approach do you find  more applicable?
While studying the play though the movie I would find Two approaches in the play:
1) Seeing and Knowing Approach: When Ophelia see that Hamlet as a full of mad, but reality is that she knew that he acts as he mad.
2)Feminist Approach: This approach is applicable for the character of Ophelia and the mother of Hamlet.




Paper-3 Sem-1 Presentation

Paper-3 Literary Theory and Criticism

To evaluate my Presentation click here


Paper-4 Sem-1 Presentation

Paper-4 Indian Writing in English

To evaluate my Presentation click here



Paper-1 Sem-1 Presentation

Paper-1 The Renaissance Literature

To evaluate my Presentation click here



Paper-2 Sem-1 Presentation

Paper-2 The Neo-Classical Literature

To evaluate my Presentation click here